ABSTRACT
Institutional archives in Southwest Asia (or the “Middle East”) typically reflect the crises that have plagued the region since the advent of modernity. Documentation practices were scarce to begin with, and, if state-sponsored archives were ever established after independence, they usually remained inaccessible. This article ponders the fate of scholarship when the historical record is subjected to another degree of erasure, namely through the systematic destruction wrought by conflicts, as has been the case in Iraq over the past few decades. Using the challenge of accounting for the art-architectural movement that emerged in post–World War II Baghdad as a case study, this obliteration may provide an opportunity for redefining the role that scholars can play in writing histories of modernism in the region. Rather than dwelling on the incompleteness or loss of traditional archives, this article questions and decenters dominant archival practices, especially in places that have experienced, and continue to endure, organized violence. It adopts the notion of the “counter-archive” and demonstrates how alternative sources such as oral accounts, fieldwork, press coverage, memoirs, and private collections can shift the course of research and yield equally valuable alternative histories. Careful interpretation of these nonconventional and typically discredited sources, aided by novel digital representation methods, can not only produce more situated chronicles, defined by the agency of local protagonists, but can also demonstrate that crossing disciplinary boundaries can create richer, layered, and unexpected narratives.